Sardar Patel: The Man of Action
Er. Prabhat Kishore
The global history is full of numerous personalities, who had reserved their name and fame through their merit and work, but very few persons can be quoted who have changed not only the history but geography of a country without shedding a drop of blood.
Sardar Patel, the Iron Man, was such uncommon personality who carried out the challengeable task of unification and consolidation of fragmented India and laid a firm basis for its orderly progress.
Born on 31st Oct. 1875, Vallabh Bhai Patel was a man of action. He came from a farmer’s family and agriculture was his only culture. His eminence was steadily from municipality level to national level unlike some other stalwarts, whose leadership came suddenly and surprisingly.
Patel was a realist. He believed in action and not just ideology. He wanted to face the problem as man of responsibility instead of engaging political wrangles of rights and wrongs of one principles or another. He was a man of faith and determination and always asked to read Gandhi’s ashram Bhajanawali.
In August 1910, Patel went to England to become a barrister. He passed his final examination in June 1912 from Lincoln’s Inn with prize. When Gandhi, in 1916, came to Gujarat Club to speak, Patel do not give any response to him. On another occasion he just went to listen to Gandhi, and unexpectedly so inspired that he became his follower.
Patel followed the philosophy of Tilak, while Gandhi regarded moderate Gokhale as his Guru. He followed the path of action which was even more militant than Tilak. In 1917 he organized successful satyagraha in Gujarat against increased land tax. In 1917 he was elected to Ahmedabad municipality and in 1924 became its president.
1928 saw the emergence of Patel as Sardar. Bardoli Satyagraha of farmers under his leadership against the arbitrary levying of taxes was so successful that the government yield within few days. This became a symbol of hope, strength and resistance of farmer’s act as a “SanjiwaniButy” to the national movement.
In 1929 for Congress Presidentship, ten provinces suggested for Gandhi, five to Patel & three to Nehru. But as per Gandhi’s wish Nehru elected. In 1931, Patel was elected Congress president. After failure of Round Table Conference in London, civil disobedience movement started. Congress was banned and Patel jailed from 1932 to 1934.
In 1937 Patel asked to stand for Congress Presidentship, but knowing Gandhi’s wish he suggested Nehru to re-elect. He was chairman of party election committee for provincial elections in 1937. He said,”Congress steam roller when set in action all kankars and patthartrying to oppose it would be leveled” and that happened. Congress formed ministry in seven provinces. In 1939 when war broke in Europe, Patel as chairman of Congress parliamentary subcommittee declared that if the war was for status quo then the Congress had nothing to do and if for world based democracy then interested. India did not want victory of Nazism or defeat of Allies, but wanted freedom.
At AICC meeting at Mumbai in August 1942 on the eve of “Bharat Chhoro” movement, Patel’s speech reached all corners of the country about non-payment of taxes, civil disobedience diverse kind of action. He appealed “let the posts and telegraph workers go on strike and let the government servant give up their services”. He was arrested on 9th August 1942 and detained in Ahmedabad fort till June 1945.
1946 was the most curious period of history, when the new president of Congress was to be elected. The person who was to be Congress president in 1946 had a crucial role to play, because it was certain that transfer of power would soon take place and the Congress President would lead the interim government.
As per Congress Constitution, its President was elected on majority of recommendations from provincial committees. Out of fifteen provincial Congress Committees, twelve proposals were for Sardar Patel and three for none. Not a single proposal was for Nehru despite Gandhi’s frequent statements in his favour.
But Gandhi had nothing to do with the masses’ dream, as he wanted Nehru to be the Prime Minister at any cost. He showed his displeasure over the proposals from provinces. Also, Nehru threatened to leave the party, if not handed over the leadership. To elect (select!) Nehru as Congress president, only a formality then was done by signing fifteen local Congress working committee members of Delhi.
Thus public choice for India’s first prime minister sidelined and Gandhi’s choice came into existence. Country missed their dream of Sardar Patel as first Prime Minister. On 2nd September 1946, Nehru was invited to form interim government and Patel was inducted as deputy Prime minister with Home portfolio.
In 1946 Nehru had to leave the Congress presidency. Patel wanted Kripalani but after sometime he resigned. Then Gandhi wanted socialists Jaiprakash Narayan or Narendra Dev to succeed Kripalani, but Patel wanted Rajendra Prasad. Prasad took over as Congress president. Similarly, in September 1950, for congress presidency Patel blessed Purushottam DasTondon while Nehru supported Acharya Janaki BallabhKripalani. Finally, Tondon won. All the above happening reflects that Patel had full command over Congress as against Nehru and even Gandhi.
Muslim League joined the interim government to fight for Pakistan as indicated by Gazanafer Ali. For their purpose they wanted Home ministry. Viceroy requested Patel to surrender his portfolio but instead he resigned. Later League was given Finance instead of Home. League rejected the Cabinet Mission Plan on 5th February 1947.
After independence the most vital problem was balkanization of India as nearly600 princely states were free to either integrate with India or Pakistan or remain independent. The vital task of merger with Indian union was neither possible by Gandhi’s fast nor Nehru’s ideology. This was possible only by man of action Patel. As a result of partition India lost 3.6 lakh square miles of territory with a population of 81.5 million, but by integration she gained 5 lakh square miles with 86 million populations.
Although difficulty came in accession of all princely states, but most critical were three states namely, Junagarh, Hyderabad and Kashmir. After some deliberation the Maharaja of Kashmir signed the accession paper, but raiders along with Pakistani army attacked Kashmir. The rulers of Junagarh and Hyderabad declared themselves independent states. Patel had to send army in all three states. Army made free Junagarh and Hyderabad and was also proceeding forward to remove Kashmir from invaders.
But Nehru’s ideology came in the way, who wanted to solve the Kashmir issue amicably. So army had to stop and nearly one-third part of Kashmir remains in the grip of Pakistan. On 1st January 1948 Nehru referred the Kashmir issue to United Nations against the wish of Patel, and thus digging own grave.
Patel wanted a strong and unified country. He always opposed reorganization of states on linguistic basis. He was against class war and Marxism. He opposed the nationalization of industries. He said that nationalization could succeed only if the government was able to manage the industries efficiently, but this was difficult for it had neither men nor resources even to run the administration. So, instead of nationalization Patel felt that industrialists should be allowed to manage the industries and increase country’s wealth.
On international policy, Patel differed with Nehru. In his prophetic letter dated 7th Nov. 1950, he condemned Chinese intervention in Tibet and cautioned the PM detailing the implications for India of Tibet’s invasion & to remain always alert at India-Tibet boundary. The warning came true when after sometime China attacked capturing more than 38000 square KM of our territory.
Thus 1946 was the turning point in the Indian history. If Patel would have been Prime Minister, then various policies on national, international, economic, education, border security issue, Tibet issue etc. would all have different and today India would have a super power. First Indian governor general and later union home minister C. Rajagopalachari said,” —— Gandhi had made blunder mistake in wanting that Nehru and not Patel should be the Prime Minister. If Patel became the Prime Minister and Nehru the Foreign Minister, then India would have avoided —– many of the errors she was led into —– under Jawaharlal Nehru and (from) glamour ——– (of) egalitarianism, which captivated his innocent heart.”
Patel’s health was deteriorating day by day in 1950. He was also under pressure due to Nehru’s style of governance and his vision towards Kashmir, Tibet and China. Unfortunately, on 15th December 1950, Patel passed away leaving the country & the masses leaderless. After entering in public life, Patel lived each and every moment for the people and the motherland selflessly, which his predecessor political leaders neither followed nor goose-step.
(The author is a technocrat and an academician. He works as Additional State Programme Officer in Bihar Education Project Council, Patna)
KV Network
