Guest

Women’s Safety: Laws Exist, But Where Is The Change?

Women’s Safety: Laws Exist, But Where Is The Change?
Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size Text Size Print This Page

Narayanan Kizhumundayur

In an age that prides itself on advancement, innovation, and progressive thinking, the question of women’s safety remains disturbingly unresolved. Cities glow with neon lights, laws are debated in parliament, and awareness campaigns fill media spaces, yet for countless women, daily life is negotiated with caution.
A late walk, a crowded bus, a workplace interaction, or even the supposed safety of home can carry an undercurrent of fear. This contradiction exposes a troubling reality: while laws for women’s safety exist in abundance, meaningful change in ground reality continues to lag behind.
Over the years, governments have enacted numerous laws aimed at protecting women from violence, harassment, and exploitation. Legal provisions addressing sexual assault, domestic violence, dowry, workplace harassment, and cybercrimes reflect an official recognition of the problem.
These laws, framed with strong language and severe punishments, promise justice, deterrence, and social reform. On paper, they appear reassuring, even empowering. They suggest a society that condemns violence against women and stands ready to defend their dignity and rights.
However, law books do not walk the streets, sit in police stations, or accompany women on their journeys through life. It is here, in the distance between legal intent and lived experience that the promise of safety weakens.
One of the most significant reasons for this gap lies in poor implementation. Complaints are often met with indifference, delay, or even hostility. Survivors are made to relive their trauma through repeated questioning, procedural hurdles, and prolonged legal battles.
Cases move slowly through an overburdened judicial system, draining victims emotionally, financially, and psychologically. When justice is delayed, it sends a quiet but powerful message that suffering can be endured and forgotten. Laws lose their deterrent value when offenders believe that consequences are unlikely or distant.
Equally damaging is the weight of societal attitudes that continue to normalize or excuse violence against women. In many instances, the focus shifts from the crime to the character of the victim.
Questions about clothing, behavior, timing, or personal choices overshadow the act of violence itself. Such attitudes do not merely discourage women from reporting crimes; they reinforce a culture of silence and shame. When society subtly suggests that safety is a woman’s responsibility rather than a collective obligation, laws struggle to take root.
Patriarchal norms further complicate this landscape. In families and communities, women are often taught to endure, adjust, and remain silent in the name of harmony or honor.
Abuse within homes is dismissed as a private matter, while harassment in public spaces is brushed aside as trivial or unavoidable. These deeply ingrained beliefs undermine legal protections by creating an environment where violations are tolerated and resistance is discouraged. Change cannot flourish where inequality is normalized from childhood.
Lack of awareness also plays a crucial role. Many women, especially those from marginalized or rural backgrounds, remain unaware of their legal rights or the mechanisms available for redress. A law that is unknown cannot be accessed, and a right that is not understood cannot be claimed. Without sustained efforts to educate and empower women at the grassroots level, legal safeguards remain distant abstractions rather than practical tools.
True change, therefore, demands more than legislation. It requires a transformation in education, where respect and equality are taught as fundamental values, not optional ideals. Schools must shape attitudes as much as intellect, ensuring that boys and girls grow up questioning stereotypes and embracing mutual dignity. Families must model equality in everyday interactions, and communities must actively reject behavior that threatens women’s safety.
Public spaces too must reflect this commitment. Streets, transport systems, workplaces, and institutions should be designed with safety in mind, supported by responsive law enforcement and sensitive handling of complaints. When safety is woven into infrastructure and governance, it ceases to be an afterthought and becomes a lived assurance.
Men, in particular, have a vital role to play in this transformation. Women’s safety is not a women’s issue alone; it is a societal responsibility. When men challenge casual sexism, intervene against harassment, and stand as allies, the moral climate begins to shift. Silence enables violence, but collective courage can dismantle it.
Ultimately, women’s safety is not merely about the absence of crime; it is about the presence of freedom. It is the freedom to move without fear, to speak without hesitation, to work without intimidation, and to live without constant vigilance. Laws can light the path, but society must walk it.
Until attitudes change, accountability strengthens, and empathy becomes instinctive, the question will persist: laws exist, but where is the change? The answer lies not only in statutes, but in conscience, commitment, and collective action.
(The author is an accounts professional and hails from Thrissur, Kerala)